hd ivus opticross hd Search Results


90
ACIST Medical Systems hd ivus opticross hd/ilab
Lumen diameters by high-definition <t>intravascular</t> <t>ultrasound</t> (HD <t>IVUS),</t> optical coherence tomography (OCT), and microcomputed tomography (μCT) across different silicone models. ( A ) 2.0 mm, ( B ) 2.5 mm, ( C ) 3.0 mm, ( D ) 3.5 mm, ( E ) 4.0 mm, ( F ) 4.5 mm, ( G ) 5.0 mm, and ( H ) 6.0 mm models. MLD, mean lumen diameter.
Hd Ivus Opticross Hd/Ilab, supplied by ACIST Medical Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/hd+ivus+opticross+hd/hd+ivus+opticross+hd+ilab/pmc12126068-139-6-11
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hd ivus opticross hd/ilab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Lumen diameters by high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and microcomputed tomography (μCT) across different silicone models. ( A ) 2.0 mm, ( B ) 2.5 mm, ( C ) 3.0 mm, ( D ) 3.5 mm, ( E ) 4.0 mm, ( F ) 4.5 mm, ( G ) 5.0 mm, and ( H ) 6.0 mm models. MLD, mean lumen diameter.

Journal: Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Article Title: High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology

doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102520

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lumen diameters by high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and microcomputed tomography (μCT) across different silicone models. ( A ) 2.0 mm, ( B ) 2.5 mm, ( C ) 3.0 mm, ( D ) 3.5 mm, ( E ) 4.0 mm, ( F ) 4.5 mm, ( G ) 5.0 mm, and ( H ) 6.0 mm models. MLD, mean lumen diameter.

Article Snippet: All 3 of them used earlier HD IVUS (OPTICROSS HD/iLab; Kodama, ACIST) and OCT (Dragonfly OPTIS/AptiVue) technologies.

Techniques: Tomography

Lumen areas by high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and microcomputed tomography (μCT) across different silicone models. ( A ) 2.0 mm, ( B ) 2.5 mm, ( C ) 3.0 mm, ( D ) 3.5 mm, ( E ) 4.0 mm, ( F ) 4.5 mm, ( G ) 5.0 mm, and ( H ) 6.0 mm models.

Journal: Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Article Title: High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology

doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102520

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lumen areas by high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and microcomputed tomography (μCT) across different silicone models. ( A ) 2.0 mm, ( B ) 2.5 mm, ( C ) 3.0 mm, ( D ) 3.5 mm, ( E ) 4.0 mm, ( F ) 4.5 mm, ( G ) 5.0 mm, and ( H ) 6.0 mm models.

Article Snippet: All 3 of them used earlier HD IVUS (OPTICROSS HD/iLab; Kodama, ACIST) and OCT (Dragonfly OPTIS/AptiVue) technologies.

Techniques: Tomography

Absolute and percentage lumen diameter and area differences of high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) vs microcomputed tomography (μCT) in silicone models. ( A ) Absolute difference of HD IVUS and OCT compared to μCT of mean lumen diameter (MLD); ( B ) absolute difference of HD IVUS and OCT compared to μCT of lumen area; ( C ) percentage difference of HD IVUS and OCT compared to μCT of MLD; ( D ) percentage difference of HD IVUS and OCT compared to μCT of lumen area.

Journal: Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Article Title: High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology

doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102520

Figure Lengend Snippet: Absolute and percentage lumen diameter and area differences of high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) vs microcomputed tomography (μCT) in silicone models. ( A ) Absolute difference of HD IVUS and OCT compared to μCT of mean lumen diameter (MLD); ( B ) absolute difference of HD IVUS and OCT compared to μCT of lumen area; ( C ) percentage difference of HD IVUS and OCT compared to μCT of MLD; ( D ) percentage difference of HD IVUS and OCT compared to μCT of lumen area.

Article Snippet: All 3 of them used earlier HD IVUS (OPTICROSS HD/iLab; Kodama, ACIST) and OCT (Dragonfly OPTIS/AptiVue) technologies.

Techniques: Tomography

Bland Altman analysis of high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) vs microcomputed tomography (μCT) in silicone models. ( A ) HD IVUS compared with μCT of mean lumen diameter (MLD); ( B ) HD IVUS compared with μCT of lumen area; ( C ) OCT compared with μCT of MLD; ( D ) OCT compared with μCT of lumen area.

Journal: Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Article Title: High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology

doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102520

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland Altman analysis of high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) vs microcomputed tomography (μCT) in silicone models. ( A ) HD IVUS compared with μCT of mean lumen diameter (MLD); ( B ) HD IVUS compared with μCT of lumen area; ( C ) OCT compared with μCT of MLD; ( D ) OCT compared with μCT of lumen area.

Article Snippet: All 3 of them used earlier HD IVUS (OPTICROSS HD/iLab; Kodama, ACIST) and OCT (Dragonfly OPTIS/AptiVue) technologies.

Techniques: Tomography

Bland Altman analysis of high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS) compared with optical coherence tomography (OCT) of mean lumen diameter (MLD) and lumen area for coronary arteries. ( A ) HD IVUS (AVVIGO+) compared with OCT (Ultreon 2.0) of MLD; ( B ) HD IVUS (AVVIGO+) compared with OCT (Ultreon 2.0) of lumen area; ( C ) HD IVUS (POLARIS) compared with OCT (AptiVue) of MLD; ( D ) HD IVUS (POLARIS) compared with OCT (AptiVue) of lumen area.

Journal: Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Article Title: High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology

doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102520

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland Altman analysis of high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS) compared with optical coherence tomography (OCT) of mean lumen diameter (MLD) and lumen area for coronary arteries. ( A ) HD IVUS (AVVIGO+) compared with OCT (Ultreon 2.0) of MLD; ( B ) HD IVUS (AVVIGO+) compared with OCT (Ultreon 2.0) of lumen area; ( C ) HD IVUS (POLARIS) compared with OCT (AptiVue) of MLD; ( D ) HD IVUS (POLARIS) compared with OCT (AptiVue) of lumen area.

Article Snippet: All 3 of them used earlier HD IVUS (OPTICROSS HD/iLab; Kodama, ACIST) and OCT (Dragonfly OPTIS/AptiVue) technologies.

Techniques: Tomography

Fine wall and plaque structures on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) vs optical coherence tomography (OCT). ( A ) Thin-cap fibroatheroma on OCT; ( B ) thin cap fibroatheroma on IVUS; ( C ) ruptured and healed fibroatheroma on OCT; ( D ) ruptured and healed fibroatheroma on IVUS; ( E ) thick cap fibroatheroma on OCT; ( F ) thick cap fibroatheroma on IVUS; ( G ) fibrocalcific atheroma on OCT; ( H ) fibrocalcific atheroma on IVUS; ( I ) spontaneous coronary artery dissection on OCT; ( J ) spontaneous coronary artery dissection on IVUS; ( K ) stent strut on OCT; ( L ) stent strut on IVUS. FC, fibrous cap; LC, lipid core; NC, necrotic core.

Journal: Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Article Title: High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology

doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102520

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fine wall and plaque structures on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) vs optical coherence tomography (OCT). ( A ) Thin-cap fibroatheroma on OCT; ( B ) thin cap fibroatheroma on IVUS; ( C ) ruptured and healed fibroatheroma on OCT; ( D ) ruptured and healed fibroatheroma on IVUS; ( E ) thick cap fibroatheroma on OCT; ( F ) thick cap fibroatheroma on IVUS; ( G ) fibrocalcific atheroma on OCT; ( H ) fibrocalcific atheroma on IVUS; ( I ) spontaneous coronary artery dissection on OCT; ( J ) spontaneous coronary artery dissection on IVUS; ( K ) stent strut on OCT; ( L ) stent strut on IVUS. FC, fibrous cap; LC, lipid core; NC, necrotic core.

Article Snippet: All 3 of them used earlier HD IVUS (OPTICROSS HD/iLab; Kodama, ACIST) and OCT (Dragonfly OPTIS/AptiVue) technologies.

Techniques: Tomography, Dissection

Comparison of lumen size and plaque morphology between high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). μCT, microcomputed tomography; MLD, mean lumen diameter.

Journal: Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions

Article Title: High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology

doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102520

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of lumen size and plaque morphology between high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). μCT, microcomputed tomography; MLD, mean lumen diameter.

Article Snippet: All 3 of them used earlier HD IVUS (OPTICROSS HD/iLab; Kodama, ACIST) and OCT (Dragonfly OPTIS/AptiVue) technologies.

Techniques: Comparison, Tomography